Our country possibly needs an Ernest Hollings or a Bill Proxmire, legendary senators who battled overspending.
That’s because the idea of the big spending federal government, in an apparently bi-partisan Keynesian idea that huge government spending always creates prosperity, is hugely popular. Congress and the administration just finished a new close to $2 trillion stimulus spending package. That’s even though the government has already spent trillions, breaking records for debt and money creation.
And these once controversial policies are expected to continue over the next decade, according to Congressional reports and budget watchers. The Federal Reserve has promised to keep interest rates at or their zero percent.
Deficit spending is now over 100 percent of the GDP and headed for about 105 percent over the next decade. This 100 percent or more debt to GDP level is something that happened in the World War II era, but not in peacetime.
“We are in uncharted territory. Among the potential risks are inflationary pressures and rising interest rates on the greatly expanded federal debt,” according to a report of the Concord Coalition, a group monitoring federal spending.
The danger, the Concord Coalition warns, is that the Federal Reserve could lose control. This increased spending and debt could overheat the economy. And that could drive up interest rates to dangerous level as it did in the late 1970s and early 1980s. That’s when interest rates were in the low 20s, an economic and societal disaster. The nation lived through a brutal recession. But, for interest sensitive businesses, such as housing and cars, it was actually a depression.
Robert Bixby, the Concord Coalition’s executive director, says the latest spending package is justified to help turn around the economy. But after this it will be essential return to more conservative spending practices.
Still, he adds that over the last few years both parties have been big spenders.
“President Trump was a big spender. He never did anything to reduce spending,” Bixby notes. Trump along with fellow Republicans and Democrats were recording $1 trillion in deficits even when the economy was booming. That’s when it was growing at 2.5 percent rates before the virus outbreak shut down the economy, Bixby notes.
A Trillion Here…A Trillion There
The CBO notes that even before this latest round of stimulus spending some $4 trillion had already been pumped into the economy through a series of bills over the last year.
And 2020 was another huge red ink year, another budget watcher says.
“You may be under the impression that the federal government spends a little more than it takes in, but you would be mistaken,” writes Tom Giovanetti, president of the Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI), a Dallas based research institute.
“In FY2020, federal revenues were $3.42 trillion, but federal spending was $6.5 trillion. In other words, the federal government spent almost TWICE what it took in. That’s not sustainable,” he writes.
Still, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), in a report projecting spending and debts over the next decade, says the long-term projection is red ink will be here for some time.
“If the current laws governing taxes and spending generally remains unchanged in 2021, the federal budget deficit will total $2.3 trillion,” according to the CBO report, “The Budget and Economic Outlook, 2020-2031.”
This $2.3 trillion number, which represents the deficit for one year, was once the number of the entire federal debt going back over decades. And, despite a small projected reduction in debt, the red ink problem will continue for the next decade.
A Perpetual Debt?
“Debt. Federal debt held by the public—which stood at 100 percent of GDP at the end of fiscal year 2020—is projected to reach 102 percent of GDP at the end of 2021, dip slightly for a few years, and then rise further. By 2031, debt would equal 107 percent of GDP, the highest in the nation’s history,” the CBO says.
Gold, silver and bitcoin will benefit as more and more dollars will have to be printed, says a hard money advocate.
“Our view is that the dollar is indeed dying, but it is not via the white-hot thermonuclear blast of hyperinflation. It is the cold drowning when even a strong swimmer, exhausted, slips below the waves at sea,” says Keith Weiner, an Austrian economist and the founder and CEO of Monetary Metals. He says it will be good year for both gold and silver.
But since the money presses are working overtime and will continue to work overtime, there is another issue this government and future ones will have to face. It is one that has been building up over the past few decades, a government report says.
The U.S. debt topped $26 trillion for the first time, according to the U.S. Treasury’s June 2020 report, but it has gone up much more since.
Who Did This?
Who is at fault for big spending?
Both parties. A recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) report notes the debt went from $5 trillion to $24 trillion over the past 25 years. Both parties ruled in this period.
This continued red ink is “unsustainable,” the report says.
That is the assessment of “The Nation’s Fiscal Health,” a GAO report last year. The report warns these spending levels can’t continue because of entitlement promises.
“While spending on Social Security already exceeds $1 trillion per year, health care and net interest are expected to grow faster than GDP and be key drivers of federal spending in the future. Medicare spending is projected to reach $1 trillion per year by 2026, and net interest is projected to hit this milestone by 2032,” GAO wrote.
Paying for Nothing
Today, we not only have unprecedented levels of red ink, but there is another danger: Much of it will end up paying for nothing. It will leave the nation with a perpetual debt.
“Over the past 50 years, net interest costs have averaged 2 percent of GDP but these costs are projected to increase to 7.2 percent by 2049, when they become the largest category of spending,” according to the GAO report.
Why does spendthrift government go on and on under both parties, despite occasional objections from a few maverick lawmakers?
This Is How We Win Elections
Big spending, at least in the short term, is good politics. No one today gets elected by promising less. No one achieves or retains power by emulating a Proxmire or a Hollings. That’s assuming anyone even remembers them.
But some leaders do have a vague idea of an economist called John Maynard Keynes, the most influential economist of the last century. Keynes famously wrote in his most influential book that the government must spend and “keep the boom going.”
However, many of our most important journalists who boost this philosophy, these men and women, who the economist F.A. Hayek once complained were “second hand dealers” in ideas, forget something that we have seen several times over the past few decades: Artificial, central bank induced booms often go bust.
125 total views